Adverse health
Below is a selection of videos, studies and reports which demonstrate the adverse biological effects on human beings from man-made RFRs and EMFs
Environmental Health Trust
The Environmental Health Trust (EHT) is “a think tank that promotes a healthier environment through research, education, and policy. It is the only non-profit organization in the world that carries out cutting edge research on environmental health hazards and also works directly with communities, health and education professionals, and policymakers to understand and mitigate these hazards”.
Environmental Health Trust
Physicians for Safe Technology
This site has many excellent posts and studies on radiofrequency radiation. See further below.
Physicians for Safe Technology supports efforts to advance safer development and use of digital and wireless technologies. We also support adequate safety testing prior to the introduction of new technologies and robust monitoring after placement of cell towers. PST strongly advocates for local control of cell tower placement with careful consideration of non-thermal human health and environmental health effects. We are especially concerned about protecting children from the physical and mental health effects as well as privacy breaches from digital and wireless technologies. We also encourage meaningful health surveys before placing cell towers, wireless infrastructure in buildings or generally increasing wireless radiofrequency radiation in the environment.
https://mdsafetech.org/physicians-call-for-safety-with-wireless-technology/
2020 - Video on 5G effects
Video with a good overview on the nature of our bodies which brings to life the reasons for concern about electromagnetic fields caused by telecoms equipment and infrastructure including mobiles, laptops, ipads, airpods, Bluetooth speakers and the like.
Video on 5G effects
2020 - Professor Tom Butler video
Video on understanding 5G health effects.
Professor Tom Butler
2020 - Bioinitiative report
This report is updated to 2020.
Bioinitiative report
Jan 2020 - Ronald Kostoff et al
This study is on the adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions.
Ronald Kostoff et al report
August 2019 - Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
This report is by Anthony B. Miller, Margaret E. Sears, L. Lloyd Morgan, Devra L. Davis, Lennart Hardell, Mark Oremus and Colin L. Soskolne
Summary:
Radiation exposure has long been a concern for the public, policy makers, and health researchers. Beginning with radar during World War II, human exposure to radio-frequency radiation1 (RFR) technologies has grown substantially over time. In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed the published literature and categorized RFR as a “possible” (Group 2B) human carcinogen. A broad range of adverse human health effects associated with RFR have been reported since the IARC review. In addition, three large-scale carcinogenicity studies in rodents exposed to levels of RFR that mimic lifetime human exposures have shown significantly increased rates of Schwannomas and malignant gliomas, as well as chromosomal DNA damage. Of particular concern are the effects of RFR exposure on the developing brain in children. Compared with an adult male, a cell phone held against the head of a child exposes deeper brain structures to greater radiation doses per unit volume, and the young, thin skull's bone marrow absorbs a roughly 10-fold higher local dose. Experimental and observational studies also suggest that men who keep cell phones in their trouser pockets have significantly lower sperm counts and significantly impaired sperm motility and morphology, including mitochondrial DNA damage. Based on the accumulated evidence, we recommend that IARC re-evaluate its 2011 classification of the human carcinogenicity of RFR, and that WHO complete a systematic review of multiple other health effects such as sperm damage. In the interim, current knowledge provides justification for governments, public health authorities, and physicians/allied health professionals to warn the population that having a cell phone next to the body is harmful, and to support measures to reduce all exposures to RFR.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00223
2019 - Video
This video is of scientists and lawyers discussing the effects of 5G.
Video
2019 - Professor Tom Butler
This article is entitled ‘On the Clear Evidence of the Risks to Children from Non-Ionizing Radio Frequency Radiation: The Case of Digital Technologies in the Home, Classroom and Society’.
Professor Tom Butler
July 2016 - Europaem guidelines
Europaem is the European Academy for Clinical Environmental Medicine. These guidelines are the ‘EMF Guideline for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of EMF-related Health Problems and Illnesses’.
Europaem 2016 guidelines
May 2011 - IARC
IARC is the International Agency for Research on Cancer. It is part of the World Health Organisation. It has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1 , associated with wireless phone use.
IARC
April 2000 - Ecolog Institut study for T Mobile (now BT plc)
This was a report commissioned by T Mobile to understand the health effects of EMFs and mobile phone use. The report is entitled ‘Mobile Telecommunications and Health - Review of the current scientific research in view of precautionary health protection’. It charts many adverse effects. Appendices A - D are below.
Ecolog Institut report
Ecolog Institute - Appendices A - D
Appendices A - D are below.
Appendices A - D
April 1981 - NASA
Electromagnetic field interaction with the human body: observed effects and theories